When doing the group responces on sakai it is a pain, try to say more than needs to be said about a subject multiple times gets old. the positive part of the whole thing is that the repitition of the process forces me to think about different ways i can adddress the same problem, so that if one way sucks after it is put to use then another is on the tip of my tongue and ready to take its place. it is hard to relay that on sakai because how bored would someone get after reading 101 ways to fuck with the font on a project, then read that 3 times, then respond, i like this because everyone is force to the same idea without another person pushing sollutions away untill we meet.

Did you see that shit. got all that work done in time for the dead line and responded to my peers. It may have taken a long time to figure out how to read that adobe file but i got done what needed to. Slowly i am hacking the process of sakia and how to get to assignments, it was close to an hour of relentless clicking to find that adobe file, once done converting into a compatible format the incription adobe puts on its files shut down my software. Repeating this process several times untill figuring out how to jump the hidden incription placed in this adobe file became fun. Sure all is well now, my peers promptly responded to the posting just as i did theirs and we will do well

The take on useing nothing like "i", "me" and things like that invites people to read. Being personal about someplace can make somebody dismiss that place they could have enjoyed.

a judging tone is not good, don't use "best" because that is in the eye of the beholder. Words such as "should" are not grounded and make somebody uneasy.

Bold the mission of your statement if you want focus to be brought to it. this is a way without saying i that a person can express a point at arms reach.

Great, great idea, this is what wiki should of done from the get go. This is the point of the internet, this site wants to be an aid and claims to be nothing more. the rules and ideas wikitravel wants to demonstrate follow a travelers interest and nothing more. What i liked is that they are not a road map, or a travelers log, a good place to find a good place, a guide, take it or leave it attitude with no focus on photos or history. i Love the idea this is not a short cut to discovery but an idea, a segway to get you to the spot you really want to go to and nothing more. Travelers comfort, mobile device friendly it claims no truth and wants no truth but asks for opinions and tells them if you look. A good word for this wiki spin off would be "comfort" there is no knowledge or statements that resemble truth here.